Legal Opinion
In re Goldstein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
At the hearings held before the referee on specifications of objections to the bankrupt’s discharge, exception was taken to the relevancy of certain evidence offered by the objecting creditor. The referee sustained the objection to the admission of the evidence. Thereupon, the creditor moved to amend specification 3, so as to lay a foundation for the proof offered.
The report of the referee states, “The Referee reserved decision and at the continued hearing on June 22, 1937 denied the motion of the objecting creditor for leave to amend on the ground of lack of power in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northeastern Real Estate Securities Corp. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re SchefflerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- In re WestonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- In re KarpDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1935
- In re SchwartzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barthlow v. More (In Re More)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Schermer (In Re Schermer)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1986
- Central Trust Co. v. Yawnick (In Re Yawnick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1982
- In re TurdoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951