Legal Opinion

In re Schwartz

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 12, 1936No. 29827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

Motion to confirm report of referee denying discharge.

The specifications as originally filed are four in number; the referee permitted an amendment to the third, by adding th.e name of a creditor to those said to have been omitted from the schedules; he also permitted a fifth specification to be added by amendment, specifying property alleged to have been knowingly and fraudulently concealed from the trustee with intent to hinder, etc., the items being articles of furniture, etc., covered by a chattel mortgage given to the creditor whose name was so added to the third…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. In re FiegenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  3. In re KufflerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Lerner v. First Wis. Nat. Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Pollet v. CoselCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northeastern Real Estate Securities Corp. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. In Re BrownDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1940
  3. Saper v. VivianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Saper v. VivianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. In re GoldsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API