Legal Opinion
In re Karp
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1935No. 15805PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
On the day (ápparently in March, 1935) on which creditors were noticed to show cause why the bankrupt’s application for discharge should not be granted, certain creditors appeared and noted opposition to the discharge in a writing wherein the “specifications” were as follows:
“1. He has failed to explain satisfactorily certain losses of assets or deficiency of assets to meet his liabilities.
“2. He has subsequently to the first day of the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of the petition transferred, removed, destroyed or concealed or permitted to be removed,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lerner v. First Wis. Nat. Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re SchefflerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- In Re FeuerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wolfe v. Tri-State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Northeastern Real Estate Securities Corp. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Schermer (In Re Schermer)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1986
- In the Matter of James George Stafos, Bankrupt. Robert D. Bell, and Cross-Appellant v. James George Stafos, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- In Re LeachDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.