Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Valenta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 26, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked for the employer as an insurance consultant at a telephone call center from October 2003 until February 2005. After she had previously received both verbal and written warnings concerning her tardiness, she was late returning from her lunch break and was terminated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified her from receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of KazakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Puello (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. In re the Claim of MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API