Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Richardson-Merrill, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1966PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creson

This appeal comes from the Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court; that is, appellant Frances D. Krohn as plaintiff, and appellee Richardson-Merrell, Inc. The 'William S. Merrell Company Division as defendant.

On June 17, 1965, plaintiff filed her declaration seeking to recover $250,000.00 in damages for loss sustained by her as a result of her husband, Howard E. Krohn, *39having taken a drng described as Triparanol, commonly referred to under the trade name of MER/29, the same having allegedly rendered him impotent.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. United Construction Workers, District 50Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Rush v. Great American Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clem v. BrownPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  4. Whitehurst v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Taylor v. ElginTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Hamby v. McDanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API