Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Kang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action alleging that defendants unlawfully discriminated against her by discharging her from employment because of her disability in violation of Executive Law § 296 (1) (a). The Human Rights Law limits the term “disability” to those stated disabilities that “do not prevent the complainant from performing in a reasonable manner the activities involved in the job or occupation sought or held” (Executive Law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Giaquinto v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. McAuliffe v. Taft Furniture Warehouse & Showroom, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. AT&T Bell Laboratories v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kwarren v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Dantonio v. Kaleida HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Regal Entertainment Group v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API