Legal Opinion
Dantonio v. Kaleida Health
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2001No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendant’s motion granted and amended complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging that defendant, her former employer, unlawfully discriminated against her by discharging her based on her disability. Following a jury trial, plaintiff was awarded approximately $545,000 in damages for past and future lost wages and benefits and pain and suffering. Defendant contends that, as a matter of law, plaintiff is not disabled within the meaning of Executive Law § 292 (former [21]) and thus is barred from recovering…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- MATTER OF MCENIRY v. LandiNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Miller v. RavitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- MATTER OF CAHILL v. RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Robert J. Disanto v. McGraw Inc./platt's DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kwarren v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Schlenger v. Fidelity Employer Services Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Haviland v. Yonkers Public SchoolsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Casale v. ReoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007