Legal Opinion

Oerther v. Pennzoil Co.

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1985No. 6-33PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Morley and Charles Oerther, operators of a retail gasoline service station, appeal from a judgment of the Eastern District of Michigan (Freeman, J.) dismissing as time barred their action for overcharges under the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (EPAA).

This is an action to recover compensatory and double damages pursuant to Section 210 of the Economic Stabilization Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1904 Note, as incorporated in the EPAA, 15 U.S.C. § 751, et seq., for alleged overcharges in the sale of gasoline. Plaintiffs allege that defendant violated 10 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Siegel Oil Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. Nelson Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Western Mountain Oil, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Northern Oil Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1989
  2. Go-Tane Service Stations, Inc. v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Carbone v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. USA Rookwood Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API