Randall v. Wolff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by the city and county of San Francisco and the members of the Civil Service Commission of San Francisco, as and constituting that body, from the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing that plaintiffs be given the rate of pay received by bricklayers in private employment on the basis that they have been and are doing the same work as bricklayers in private industry and, under provisions of the San Francisco Charter (see §§ 151 and 151.3), are entitled to the same rate of pay.
The amended petition alleges ‘ ‘ That during all of said times Section 151 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Michelin Tire Co. v. Coleman & Bentel Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bauer v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959