Legal Opinion

Loan & Savings Bank of Camden v. Peurifoy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1927No. 12288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

For the sake of brevity, in our discussion of the questions raised by this appeal, we shall refer to the American Bank & Trust Company of Columbia as the Columbia Bank, to the Loan & Savings Bank of Camden as the Camden Bank, and to the Merchants’ & Planters’ Bank of Plartsville as the Hartsville Bank.

On the afternoon of June 25, 1926, the directors of the Columbia Bank passed a resolution admitting its inability to meet its obligations, and placed its affairs in the hands of the State Bank Examiner for a period of 30 days.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Citizens Bank v. Bradley, ExaminerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Wasson v. HawkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fant, Examiner v. Easley Loan Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. South Carolina State Bank, Rec'r v. StokesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. Huggins v. Commercial & Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API