Legal Opinion · Dissent

Huggins v. Commercial & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 19, 1927No. 12290Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : This is an action at law to recover the sum of $3,000.00, with interest, the amount of a deposit made by the plaintiff with the Citizens’ Bank of Timmonsville, on August 16, 1919, for which no account has ever been made by said bank. The plaintiff claims that the defendant, Commercial & Savings Bank, of the same place, is liable to him for said deposit by reason of the fact that on October 5, 1922, when the Citizens’ Bank was “embarrassed and in imminent danger of insolvency,” it transferred to the defendant all of its assets, including the $3,000.00 of the plaintiff then to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luedecke v. Des Moines Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Livingstain v. Columbian Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Citizens Bank v. Bradley, ExaminerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Okmulgee Window Glass Co. v. FrinkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Collinsville Nat. Bank v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API