Legal Opinion

Rose v. Wissinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1982No. 597PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This appeal was taken from a lower court order sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing appellants’ complaint. We agree with the Honorable Ralph H. Smith, Jr. of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that appellants did not set forth a cognizable theory in their complaint upon which they may seek recovery under the law of Pennsylvania, and we, accordingly, affirm the lower court order dismissing that complaint.

The relevant facts may be summarized as follows. While a patient at St. Francis General Hospital, Inc.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Donald Boyanowski v. Capital Area Intermediate UnitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Shaffer v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. McArdle v. TronettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API