G.F.D. Enterprises, Inc. v. Nye
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The sole issue presented by this case is whether either of the appellee banks herein may be held liable to appellants for accepting for payment at Nye’s direction the corporate checks drawn over the unauthorized signatures, or forgeries, of Nye. Because both of these banks took the checks as holders in due course, because appellant G.F.D. Enterprises’ own negligence substantially contributed to the making of the unauthorized signatures, and because no warranty action existed between the parties, we answer such query in the negative and affirm the court of appeals’ decision.
As noted by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Bank of Southern Maryland v. Robertson's Crab House, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Thompson Maple Products, Inc. v. Citizens National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gerard C. Menichini, T/a Best Legal Services v. Lissa L. Grant Mellon Bank (East), Mellon Bank (East) National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Master Chemical Corp. v. InkrottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Dalton & Marberry, P.C. v. Nationsbank, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Texas Stadium Corp. v. Savings of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.