Legal Opinion
The Cutler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 7, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
These two suits in admiralty, arising out of a collision in New York bay in the vicinity of Robbins Reef, were tried together. At the end of the trial I expressed the view that both the tug “Calateo No. 2” and the M/V “Julius H. Barnes” were at fault and that the damages should be divided. There was no fault on the part of the barge. The M/V “Barnes” .sustained damage to her plates and deck when her port side, a little forward of midship, came in contact with the bow of the barge “Cutler,” which was in tow alongside of the tug “Calateo No. 2.” The bow of the barge was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Ocean S. S. Co. of Savannah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Postal S. S. Corp. v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- New York & Albany Lighterage Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- The Senator RiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crawford v. Indian Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Blume v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1966
- Crawford v. Indian Towing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Tug Captain DannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995