State v. Cross
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first contends the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutrix to testify over objection that she became pregnant as the result of the rape. Defendant says this testimony was offered only to excite sympathy for the prosecutrix and to play upon the passions and prejudices of the jury.
Rape is the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. State v. Primes, 275 N.C. 61, 165 S.E. 2d 225 (1969); State v. Overman, 269 N.C. 453, 153 S.E. 2d. 44 (1967). There must be penetration of the sexual organ of the female by the sexual, organ of the male to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.