Legal Opinion

United States v. Marsh

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1939No. 4509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal in a war risk insurance case which was before this court in Marsh v. United States, 4 Cir., 97 F.2d 327. On the trial lasfhad, the government made a motion for directed verdict, action on which was reserved by the court. After verdict for plaintiff, motion was made to set aside the verdict and enter judgment in accordance with the motion, non obstante veredicto, under Rule 50(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. This motion was denied; and, from judgment for plaintiffs, the government has appealed. The only question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Theberge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Marsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API