People v. Pendarvis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forging and uttering a prescription for a narcotic in violation of section 11715 of the Health and Safety Code. On appeal, it is argued that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; that the trial court failed to make a preliminary determination as to the voluntariness of a confession introduced at the trial; that the introduction of the confession was a violation of due process of law; that he was deprived of due process; that the trial court erroneously permitted allusions to the defendant’s prior…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. KitchensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ByrdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In re D. A. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Matter of DASDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978