Legal Opinion

People v. Pendarvis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1961No. Crim. 3814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forging and uttering a prescription for a narcotic in violation of section 11715 of the Health and Safety Code. On appeal, it is argued that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; that the trial court failed to make a preliminary determination as to the voluntariness of a confession introduced at the trial; that the introduction of the confession was a violation of due process of law; that he was deprived of due process; that the trial court erroneously permitted allusions to the defendant’s prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. KitchensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. ByrdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. In re D. A. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Matter of DASDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API