Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Harding Industrial Tool

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the common-law causes of action alleged in the complaint are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (7 USC § 136 et seq.). Harding Industrial Tool, Master Chemical Corporation (Master Chemical) and Allied Amphenol Corporation (Allied) cross-appeal from that same order insofar as it brings up for review an earlier order denying the motions of Master Chemical and Allied for summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Continental Insurance v. Helmsley Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Johnson v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bano v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Annunziato v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Seekings v. Jamestown Public School SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Humphreys v. HumphreysDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  5. Bano v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API