Legal Opinion

Bano v. Union Carbide Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 17, 2004No. 03-7416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

361 F.3d 696

Sajida BANO, Haseena BI, Sunil Kumar, Dr. Stanley Norton, Asad Khan, Shiv Narayan Maithil, Devendra Kumar Yadav, Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Udyog Sangathan (BGPMUS), Gas Peedit Nirashrit Pension Bhogi Sangharsh Morcha (GPNPBSM), Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmachari Sangh (BGPMSKS), Bhopal Gas Peedit Sangharsh Sahayog Samiti (BGPSSS), and Bhopal Group for Information and Action (BGIA), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

Haseena BI, Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Udyog Sangathan (BGPMUS), Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmachari Sangh…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sahu v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API