Legal Opinion
Rosenau v. Farm Service Agency
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided May 11, 2005No. A1-02-01PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
This dispute is back before the Court after remand to the Defendant. The Plaintiffs filed a Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on November 10, 2004, and the Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on December 2, 2004. This case stems from a decision by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”) and the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) that the Rosenaus had converted wetlands on land they rent and were ineligible for a portion of USDA federal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Leslie Downer v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the United States Department of Agriculture and Soil Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Keith Barthel Dorothy Barthel v. United States Department of Agriculture, Daniel Glickman, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holly Hill Farm Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Maple Drive Farms Ltd. Partnership v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- MEDCENTER ONE HEALTH SYSTEMS v. LeavittDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2009
- Holly Hill Farm v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006