Leslie Downer v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the United States Department of Agriculture and Soil Conservation Service
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Leslie Downer was denied crop subsidy payments for his 1989 crop after the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), acting through the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS),1 determined that Downer had violated the Swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3821-3824 (1994). Downer exhausted his administrative appeals and filed suit in federal district court, contesting the agency decision as arbitrary and capricious. The district court granted summary judgment to the agency. Downer appeals, and we affirm.
I
D…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Charles Gunn v. United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Holly Hill Farm Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Branstad v. GlickmanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.