Legal Opinion

Maple Drive Farms Ltd. Partnership v. Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2015No. 13-1091PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The “Swampbuster” provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 deny certain farm-program benefits to persons who convert a Wetland on their property for agricultural purposes. Nicholas H. Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture’s determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. Specifically, Smith contends that the Department erred when it failed to: (1) analyze whether his purported conversion would have only a minimal effect on surrounding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. General Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rita Johnson v. Timothy MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. RAMON R. CHERRY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Ronald Lee v. Mercury Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. Verble v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
  5. Blackwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API