Raven Offshore Yacht Shipping, Llc & Richard Gladych v. F.t. Holdings, Llc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.
¶1 Whether a specific dispute is within the scope of an arbitration agreement is generally a question for the court. But the parties may, by contract, delegate the issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator. By incorporating the rules of an arbitration body, the parties give clear and unmistakable evidence that they agree to be bound by those rules, including on the issue of arbitrability.
¶2 F.T. Holdings LLC (FT) entered into a contract with Raven Offshore Yacht Shipping LLP. The contract included an arbitration clause, under which the parties agreed to arbitrate disputes according to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apex Management Group I, Inc. and Jeffrey Bemoras v. Verdegard Administrators, LLC, f/k/a Hawaii Mainland Administrators, LLC; Regional Care, Inc.; and DWS Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Pinnacle Peak AdministratorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Barbara Grashin & Shelby Company, Llc v. Rita AnchesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Benjamin Woolley v. El Toro.com, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Justin Oakley, V. Domino's Pizza LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022