Legal Opinion

Beatty Oil & Gas Co. v. Blanton

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 14, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Beatty Oil & Gas Company against Alex Blanton, S. J. Blanton, Harry Daniel, and others. On motion by plaintiff for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

This cause is before me on motion of plaintiff for a preliminary injunction.

[1] The defendants Alex Blanton, S. J. Blanton, and Harry Daniel have alone appeared and objected to the motion. They object to the motion on two grounds. One is that plaintiff’s lease was forfeited by failure to pay the quarterly rental, due November 4, 1916, and hence it has no. rights thereunder which it is entitled to have protected. The lease in question granted to the lessee the right for 10 years to explore for oil and contained a covenant on his part to complete a well within one year…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnsdall v. Bradford Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Lindlay v. RaydureDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McKay v. TallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Hunter v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Texas Co. v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Joseph Miele Const. Co. v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API