Legal Opinion
Joseph Miele Const. Co. v. City of Niagara Falls
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 18, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
On February 21, 1936, the defendant, City of Niagara Falls, and Di Marco & Ciccone, Inc., both corporations of the State of New York, entered into a contract for the construction of certain sewers in the City of Niagara Falls, in this district. On the same day Di Marco & Ciccone, Inc., entered into an agreement in writing, in which it is recited that it “sold, assigned,-transferred and set over * * * unto Joseph Miele Construction Co., Inc., of Maplewood, New Jersey, the said contract and any and all sums of money or other benefit or advantage that may be had or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Spencer v. Standard Chemicals & Metals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeJong v. B F Goodrich, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Koehne v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Stringfield v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943