Legal Opinion

Williams v. Barnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1955No. Civ. 5043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELL, J. pro tem. *

Four separate causes of action were set up by plaintiff’s complaint, the first for a decree quieting title to certain land and the other three for the recovery of certain sums of money. Pursuant to an oral stipulation entered into in open court, judgment was to be entered on the second and third causes of action in favor of the party or parties who might prevail on the first cause of action, and, in any event, in favor of the plaintiff on the fourth cause of action. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants Alvin S. Barnett and Sina J. Barnett, upon the first cause of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Kraus v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Meacci v. KochergenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Roman v. RiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API