McGovern v. McGovern
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner seeking divorce on the ground of desertion, excepts to the adverse report of the special master.
The master's report, that the material facts as to the alleged desertion have not been proven, is evidently based on the fact that the parties had sexual intercourse in May, 1931, for he calls attention to the fact that this was within two years prior to the filing of the petition.
The petition, filed February 19th, 1932, alleges a desertion of over two years, commencing in May, 1928, and continuing down to the time of suit.
Examination of the record shows that the petitioner's testimony…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Michels v. MichelsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Leech v. LeechNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Bravo v. BravoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
- Mikecz v. MikeczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Sabia v. SabiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Bivins v. Bivins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1962
- Doe v. DoeConnecticut Superior Court · 1944