Legal Opinion

Mikecz v. Mikecz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 27, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

The petitioner, Mary Mikecz, alleges that she and the defendant were lawfully joined in the bonds of matrimony May 7th, 1914; that defendant deserted her in the month of May, 1918, since which time and until April, 1921, and for more than two years, the defendant willfully, continuedlv *40and obstinately deserted the petitioner; that thereafter and in the month of April, 1921, the petitioner, at the request of the defendant, forgave and condoned the aforesaid offense and again resided and cohabited with defendant until the month of February, 1922, when defendant again deserted…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. McGovernNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Ashendorf v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API