Bravo v. Bravo
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On. exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Bacices, V. C.
The petition charges adultery. The master to whom it was referred found the charge to he true, but also: found that the offence had been condoned, and, therefore, advised against a divorce, to which exceptions were taken.
The testimony satisfactorily establishes both findings, but the master disregarded the fact that the forgiveness had been forfeited by the husband’s later conduct. The offence took place in 1914, while the parties were living in Brooklyn, and it occurred in their home. They continued to live together in New York, and then for five years, until August 24th last,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Blaine v. RitgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- McGovern v. McGovernNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Sperling v. SperlingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Doe v. DoeConnecticut Superior Court · 1944