Vinzant v. Elam
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
John VinZant challenges a child custody modification order and the motions which preceded its entry. We conclude that John’s rights of due process were violated by the lack of notice that his custody rights were at issue at the hearing that preceded entry of the modification order. We therefore vacate that order and remand.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
John VinZant and Tammy Elam divorced in August 1995. The superior court adopted the parties’ agreement regarding custody of their three children; it granted joint legal custody to both parties, but gave…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Skinner v. HagbergAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Wyatt v. Estate of WyattAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Blaufuss v. BallAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.