Legal Opinion

United States v. Natalie Cotton Peters

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 24, 2009No. 08-12897Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Pro se Defendant Natalie Peters (“Defendant”) appeals the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Defendant’s motion; we affirm.

In 2003, Defendant was convicted of one count of making a residence available for the distribution and storage of cocaine and crack in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 856(a)(2),(b). Before sentencing, the probation officer determined that Defendant was involved with more than 12 kilograms of crack cocaine and more than 250 grams of powder cocaine, which corresponded to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Matthew Mark MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API