Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Mark Moreno

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 26, 2005No. 04-15950UnpublishedCited by 144 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Matthew Mark Moreno, proceeding pro se, appeals the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). On appeal, Moreno challenges the district court’s findings that (1) Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines does not provide a basis to reduce his sentence, and (2) United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not provide a jurisdictional basis for the district court to consider his post-sentencing rehabilitative efforts in a § 3582(c)(2) motion.

I

In January 1996, Morena was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. BravoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Victor Varela v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Don Newcombe BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Antonio Bernard FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API