Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Haag

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 2009No. 69 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether two offenses of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”) occurring within one and one-half hours of each other should be considered first and second offenses for purposes of sentencing under the recidivist provisions of the Vehicle Code. Because we conclude that 75 Pa.C.S. § 3806(b) requires that an offender have a conviction, or other specified form of judicial process, on a precedent offense prior to the commission of a subsequent violation in order for the subsequent offense to be considered a “second offense”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. LeidigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. NievesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. MisnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. JaroweckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. BowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. CattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API