Legal Opinion
Young v. Karol
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided December 3, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMartha Zelman, J.
Plaintiffs Stanley Young and. Dorothy Young (hereinafter referred to as Purchasers) and defendants Sidney Karol and Mildred Karol (hereinafter referred to as Sellers) entered into a contract May 18, 1974 to purchase a one-family home located at 64-22 215 Street, Bayside, Queens.
The premises were supplied with a. septic tank, and although a public sewer system had been available, said premises were not connected to same. The leaders and gutters of the premises direct rain water onto the ground and are also concededly not connected to a public storm sewer.
The Building Code of City of New York…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Angerosa v. White CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Reynolds v. Mayor, Lane & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Northern Properties, Inc. v. Kuf Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. KarolAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975