Legal Opinion

Young v. Karol

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 8, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

Plaintiffs, the purchasers of real property from defendants, have brought an action for damages for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation in connection with the purchase. Judgment was awarded to plaintiffs after trial (Young v Karol, 80 Misc 2d 70) and the instant appeal has been taken by the defendants therefrom.

The burden of proof was upon the plaintiffs to establish their case by a fair preponderance of the evidence, and this burden was not adequately met by a showing that the defend*860ants were in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Staff v. Lido Dunes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Horby Realty Corp. v. Yarmouth Land Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Montkane Funds, Inc. v. RuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  5. Northern Properties, Inc. v. Kuf Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hotel Constructors, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API