Legal Opinion

California Medical Ass'n v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2000No. 98-56134PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether a party that has paid its adversary’s attorney’s fees can petition under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) for relief from the fee judgment, if the underlying merits judgment is reversed.

I

California Medical Association and the other plaintiffs (collectively the “Associations”) provide medical services to Medicare beneficiaries. The Associations sued for higher reimbursements under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Medicare statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq. The district court ruled for the Associations and subsequently granted their 42 U.S.C. § 1988 motion for attorney’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Kathlyn M. Kennedy v. Applause, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. John S. Terket v. Harold LundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Richard E. Maul v. Dr. Evan Constan, Anthony A. Metzcus and Richard GoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Oster v. BaackColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Nutrition Distribution LLC v. Ironmag Labs, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. California Medical Association v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Mojica v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API