California Medical Ass'n v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether a party that has paid its adversary’s attorney’s fees can petition under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) for relief from the fee judgment, if the underlying merits judgment is reversed.
I
California Medical Association and the other plaintiffs (collectively the “Associations”) provide medical services to Medicare beneficiaries. The Associations sued for higher reimbursements under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Medicare statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq. The district court ruled for the Associations and subsequently granted their 42 U.S.C. § 1988 motion for attorney’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kathlyn M. Kennedy v. Applause, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- John S. Terket v. Harold LundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Richard E. Maul v. Dr. Evan Constan, Anthony A. Metzcus and Richard GoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Oster v. BaackColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Nutrition Distribution LLC v. Ironmag Labs, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- California Medical Association v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mojica v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.