Legal Opinion
Oster v. Baack
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA0760PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE DAILEY
{1 Defendant, Judy Baack, appeals from the trial court's order denying her C.R.C.P. 60 motion to vacate an award of attorney fees and costs that had previously been entered in favor of plaintiffs, Heidi Oster and Horizon Women's Care Professional, LLC (Horizon).
T2 Baack raises here an issue of first impression, that is, whether a party who has not directly appealed from an order awarding attorney fees and costs may still challenge that award under C.R.C.P. 60. Because, under the particular cireumstances of this case, we agree that Baack was entitled to do so, we reverse…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hunt v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- John S. Terket v. Harold LundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- and 15CA0203. DA Mountain Rentals, LLC v. The Lodge at Lionshead Phase III Condominium Association, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Gagne v. GagneColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Lucero v. UlvestadColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- v. SCC PuebloColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.