People v. Peters
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
We granted leave to consider whether an order of restitution should abate where a convicted criminal defendant died pending *517appeal of his conviction.1 To decide this issue it is necessary to clarify our position on the rule of abatement ab initio.
In People v Elauim, we applied the rule of abatement ab initio to dismiss an appeal from, a criminal conviction and erase the criminal conviction and accompanying penal sanctions where a defendant died pending appeal.2 We continue to believe that it is appropriate to dismiss an appeal upon the death of a convicted criminal defendant, but are not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Surland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. GarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.