Legal Opinion

People v. Peters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1995No. 99830, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

We granted leave to consider whether an order of restitution should abate where a convicted criminal defendant died pending *517appeal of his conviction.1 To decide this issue it is necessary to clarify our position on the rule of abatement ab initio.

In People v Elauim, we applied the rule of abatement ab initio to dismiss an appeal from, a criminal conviction and erase the criminal conviction and accompanying penal sanctions where a defendant died pending appeal.2 We continue to believe that it is appropriate to dismiss an appeal upon the death of a convicted criminal defendant, but are not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Surland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. GarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API