State v. Veltri
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
After convicting a defendant of driving while intoxicated, should a Superior Court trial justice have granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial, overturned his conviction, and then dismissed the charges against him on the grounds that, after his arrest, the police had failed to provide him with a free telephone call? No, we hold, absent any evidence that the defendant had suffered substantial and irremediable prejudice as a result.
After convicting defendant, Alfred J. Veltri (Veltri or defendant), of one count of driving while intoxicated, the Superior Court vacated the verdict…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LemieuxSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. PinheiroSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- State v. QUATTRUCCISupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012