Legal Opinion

Monkhouse v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 31, 1993No. 06-92-00015-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Lafonda Monkhouse appeals from her conviction for possession of less than twenty-eight grams of a controlled substance. A jury found her guilty and assessed punishment at fifteen years’ confinement.

On appeal, Monkhouse contends that the trial court erred in overruling her objections to the State’s repeated questions regarding an extraneous offense during the punishment phase, that the State acted in bad faith in propounding questions that presented unfounded and inadmissible extraneous offense material to the jury, and that the trial court erred in overruling her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Fuentes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Arthur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Fant-Caughman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API