Legal Opinion

Fant-Caughman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided June 15, 2001No. 07-00-0220-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVIS, Justice.

Upon a plea of not guilty, a jury convicted appellant Paul Anthony Fant-Caugh-man, aka Paul Fant, for aggravated sexual assault and indecency with a child. Punishment was assessed at life imprisonment for the aggravated sexual assault conviction and at twenty years confinement and a $10,000 fine for the indecency with a child conviction with the sentences to run consecutively pursuant to Texas Penal Code section 3.03. Presenting six points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of extraneous acts of misconduct, in allowing improper jury…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Peters v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  3. Abdullah, StedmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Abdullah, StedmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Brent David Derrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API