Legal Opinion
Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Gazzara
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1985No. 83 Civ. 6825 (LBS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., challenges the constitutionality of New York’s liquor price affirmation statute, N.Y.ABC Law § 101 — b(3), contending that it is violative on its face of the Commerce Clause. Plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the statute unconstitutional and enjoining the defendant officials of the State Liquor Authority (hereinafter “SLA”) from enforcing it. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. 1 The New York State Wholesale Liquor Association, together with various individual liquor suppliers, have intervened on behalf of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. GazzaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. GazzaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986