Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1986No. 84-2030Published

1Dissent

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice White and Justice Rehnquist join,

dissenting.

Speculation about hypothetical cases illuminates the discussion in a classroom, but it is evidence and historical fact that provide the most illumination in a courtroom. Forgoing the support of a record developed at trial, appellant BrownForman Distillers Corporation (Brown-Forman) contends that New York’s Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Law § 100 et seq. (McKinney 1970 and Supp. 1986) is an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce “on its face.” Over 20 years ago this Court unanimously refused to invalidate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API