Legal Opinion

Gamble-Robinson Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1924No. 23,642Published

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In this action to recover for loss on a carload of sugar because of a drop in the market price while the shipment was wrongfully delayed in transit, the answer alleged as a defense that no written notice of loss was given as provided in the bill of lading. A demurrer to this defense was sustained. Defendant appeals.

This was an interstate shipment, for which a bill of lading in the standard form prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission was issued. The pertinent parts thereof read:

“Claims must be made in writing to the originating or delivering carrier within six months after delivery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hailey v. Oregon Short Line R.District Court, D. Idaho · 1918
  2. Cornelius v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. McElwain v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Conover v. Wabash Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  5. E. B. Conover & Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API