Legal Opinion

Hailey v. Oregon Short Line R.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided September 4, 1918PublishedCited by 18 opinions

At L,aw. Action by J. A. Hailey, J. W. Stneecl, and C. R. Smeed, copartners doing business as the Caldwell Horse & Mule Company, against the Oregon Short L,ine Railroad Company, a corporation. On motion to strike a portion of the answer, and demurrer thereto.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

[1, 2] The plaintiffs, doing business under the firm name of Caldwell Horse & M ule Company, have brought this action to recover from the defendant the aggregate sum of $6,553.-40, on account of damages which they claim to have suffered as a consequence of the negligence of the defendant company and connecting carriers in transporting for them 139 head of horses from Caldwell, Idaho, to East St. Louis, Ill., on the 24th day of January, 1917. In substance it is charged that the time consumed in the transportation was 16 days, whereas it should have been only 7, and…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Monteleone v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  3. Gulf Insurance Company v. BallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. J & C DRUG COMPANY v. Maryland Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Ritchie v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API