Legal Opinion

Downey v. Union Paving Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 11, 1949No. 9744PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant seeks reversal of a judgment, obtained against it, on two grounds (1) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law in that he did not have his car under such control that he could stop it within the range of his headlights; 1 and (2) that the road excavation into which the plaintiff’s automobile was driven was at that time under the control of an independent contractor and not the defendant, the primary contractor.

Viewed in favor of the plaintiff, as it must be, the evidence concerning the accident is as follows:

About 20 minutes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Silveus v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Hutchinson v. Follmer Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Mogren Et Ux. v. GadonasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Joseph P. Makowsky, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Makowsky, Deceased v. Michael Povlick and Robert F. StegmeierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Johns v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Union Paving Co. To Use of United States Cas. Co. v. Thomas (United States Cas. Co., Third-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Mahon v. City of BethlehemDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Daniels v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API