Legal Opinion

State v. Rosa

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 24, 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Peter A. Rosa appeals his jury conviction in Superior Court (Penob-scot County; Pierson, J.) for rape pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 252(1)(B) (1983). Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence of compulsion to support the conviction. He also argues that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court improperly admitted hearsay testimony and singled out defendant’s credibility in a jury instruction. Defendant further challenges the legality of his sentence on the ground that he was not allowed effectively to rebut alleged inaccuracies contained in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. SamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. Mary Walton v. David C. Ireland Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. State v. WeirSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. State v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API