Legal Opinion

Fountain v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 13, 1996No. 2:96-cv-72532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR BOND, GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE AND DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S' REQUEST FOR RE-SENTENCING

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. The Matter in Front of the Court.

This case is presently before the Court on Petitioner Joe Willie Fountain’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). 1 Petitioner went to trial and was convicted 2 before this Court on Counts 2 through 5 of his January 16, 1992 Superseding Indictment. These counts were as follows, Count 2: possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute it within…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Guido Riascos-Suarez A/K/A Kennedy Diuza-RiascosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Joe W. Fountain (92-1507) Carlton B. McEaddy (92-1866)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. NewtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  2. Ferrell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Fonseca v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API