Legal Opinion

Giuliani v. Chuck

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1980No. 6497PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*380OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, J.

Robert L. and Inge E. Giuliani, plaintiffs below, appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Walter Chuck, defendant below, in their tort action against him. The questions on appeal are whether any genuine issue of material fact existed and whether defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Technicolor, Inc. v. Traeger, 57 Haw. 113, 118, 551 P.2d 163, 168 (1976); rule 56, Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP).

For purposes of this appeal, the facts and inferences drawn from them are viewed in the light most favorable to the Giulianis. Iuli…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Kang v. HarringtonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Technicolor, Inc. v. TraegerHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Spence v. Spence Ex Rel. SpenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Hungate v. Law Office of David B. RosenHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Buscher v. BoningHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API