Legal Opinion

Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1991No. 90-2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARZA, Circuit Judge:

CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ART. 5 § 3-C AND TEX.R. APP.P. 114 TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS AND THE HONORABLE JUSTICES THEREOF:

1. STYLE OF THE CASE.

The style of the case in which this certificate is made is Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Schlumberger Limited (N.V.) and Schlum-berger Well Services, a Division of Schlum-berger Technology Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, Case No. 90-2005, in the United States Court of Appeals for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Amberboy v. Societe De Banque PriveeTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Amberboy v. Societe De Banque PriveeTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API